
Court
clarifies authority of marital masters
Published 06/07/07
Under
New Hampshire law the legislature may ask the state supreme court
to offer advisory opinions on proposed legislation. The legislature
petitions the supreme court to answer questions about the proposed
statute, such as whether the proposed legislation would violate
the New Hampshire Constitution if passed.
In
a decision issued May 30, 2007, the supreme court was asked to offer
an advisory opinion regarding a statute that dealt with the scope
of authority invested in a marital master. In many courts throughout
the state, divorce and custody actions are heard by marital masters.
A
marital master is not a judicial officer within the meaning of the
New Hampshire Constitution because they are neither nominated nor
appointed by the Governor and Council. Under current law, a marital
master serves an initial term of three years. Their reappointment
is governed by the Judicial Branch Family Division Rules. During
their appointment terms, the Family Division has the authority to
conduct performance reviews and terminate the master if necessary.
In essence they are removable by the court at will.
When
a marital master hears a case, he or she will make a recommendation
to the court as to how the case should be decided. The recommendation
is not binding upon the court and has no effect unless it is countersigned
by a judge.
The
supreme court concluded that a statute which would make a marital
master's recommendation final within ten days of issuance unless
a party requested that it be reviewed by a judge would grant the
marital master the authority of a judicial officer. Therefore, such
a statute would violate the New Hampshire Constitution.
Even
though a marital master is not an appointed judge, they perform
a tremendous service to the judicial branch. Without their services,
the processing of custody and divorce cases would grind to a halt.
They are experienced family law practitioners and should be afforded
the same level of respect that one would show to a judge in our
judicial system.
Andrew
J. Piela is an associate attorney at Hamblett & Kerrigan,
P.A. His legal practice includes civil litigation, family law, land
use litigation and probate. You can reach Attorney Piela by e-mail
at: apiela@hamker.com
This information is general
information and may not reflect the most current legal developments,
verdicts or settlements. The information provided should not
be relied upon as an indication of the actual state of the
law or of future developments. The information contained on
the Hamblett & Kerrigan website is for informational purposes
only and does not constitute legal advice. If the information
referenced may be of legal importance to you, you should consult
with an attorney to provide you with legal guidance and opinion
as the the effect of the current law upon your situation. |