
Premarital
Agreements in New Hampshire 12/13/07
Published 12/13/07
While
once considered only the province of the rich and famous, premarital
agreements are becoming more common in today's society. A premarital
agreement is a contract signed before the marriage between the soon
to be husband and the soon to be wife which sets forth the division
of assets and liabilities in the event of death and/or divorce.
For example, a party may come into a marriage owning significant
assets, such as real estate or investments, and he or she may want
a premarital agreement so that, in the event of death or divorce,
the terms of the premarital agreement would govern the other spouse
claim to the premarital asset.
Premarital
agreements must be drafted with extreme caution. It is important,
first, to understand that a New Hampshire court will not enforce
any premarital agreement which attempts to set forth a child custody
schedule or a child support order.
In
addition, when negotiating a premarital agreement, both sides must
make a full, accurate and complete disclosure of their financial
assets and liabilities. If it is subsequently shown that there was
not a complete or accurate disclosure, the premarital agreement
could be voided.
When
negotiating a premarital agreement, one should take care to ensure
that there was adequate time before the wedding to resolve any disputes
in the agreement. While a New Hampshire court will not automatically
invalidate a premarital agreement that is given to the spouse on
the eve of the wedding, such an occurrence could be a significant
factor in determining whether the agreement is enforceable..
In
determining whether a premarital agreement is enforceable, a court
will take into account the skills of the attorneys who were drafting
the agreement, whether the attorneys had adequate time to fully
familiarize themselves with the case, and if they had time to determine
whether a full and complete disclosure of assets had been made.
In a recent decision, the Supreme Court invalidated a premarital
agreement that was negotiated days before the wedding in which the
wife was represented by an attorney who had limited skill in drafting
premarital agreements and little opportunity to validate the data
that was presented to him by the husband.
It
should be noted that merely because one spouse chooses not to challenge
the premarital agreement during the marriage, does not mean that
a challenge cannot be brought during the divorce. The Supreme Court
has held that a spouse seeking to invalidate a premarital agreement
need not bring such an action prior to the divorce as this would
encourage needless litigation between spouses.
In
sum, a couple should not attempt to draft or negotiate a premarital
agreement without first seeking the advice of competent counsel.
Andrew
J. Piela is an associate attorney at Hamblett & Kerrigan,
P.A. His legal practice includes civil litigation, family law, land
use litigation and probate. You can reach Attorney Piela by e-mail
at: apiela@hamker.com
This information is general
information and may not reflect the most current legal developments,
verdicts or settlements. The information provided should not
be relied upon as an indication of the actual state of the
law or of future developments. The information contained on
the Hamblett & Kerrigan website is for informational purposes
only and does not constitute legal advice. If the information
referenced may be of legal importance to you, you should consult
with an attorney to provide you with legal guidance and opinion
as the the effect of the current law upon your situation. |