|

Agreements
settle who owns patents, copyrights
Published 09/28/99
Patents
and copyrights are valuable assets of companies, worthy of protection.
It is important for employers, independent contractors, and employees
to understand that absent a clear written agreement, there may be
a legal issue as to who owns a patent or a copyright for work created
by an employee or independent contractor while "on the employers
clock."
Generally,
absent an agreement, patents are owned by the individual who invents
the patentable device or process, not the employer, and it is that
individual who is entitled to apply for and own the patent. If an
employee invents a patentable device or process while on employer
time, generally the employer owns what is called "shop rights"
to that patented invention. Those shop rights are less valuable
than an outright assignment of the patent in that while the employer
can use the patented invention, it cannot prevent the employee from
using the invention or licensing it through others. Furthermore,
a shop right is personal to the employer so the employer cannot
obtain revenue by assigning or licensing the right to any third
parties, but can only transfer the shop right pursuant to a sale
of the entire business.
If
the employee holds a fiduciary role such as being an officer, director
or major shareholder of a corporation, or partner in partnership,
he will have a duty of loyalty and good faith to the employer and
may have an obligation to assign to the employer any patents resulting
from inventions which are within the scope of the employers
business. Further, if the employer specifically hired the individual
to invent this type of invention, then a Court may force the employee
to assign the patent. Likewise, if the employees in that particular
department had historically been assigning their patents to the
employer, an implied assignment may exist. However, relying on these
possible exceptions to the general rule is not prudent, particularly
when an employer can remove doubt by having a contract that requires
the employee or an independent contractor to: a) disclose to the
employer any intellectual property that she creates or discovers
as related to employers business; b) assign all rights thereto
completing all documents to protect the companys rights; and
c) cooperate in the enforcement of the employers rights against
third parties.
Under
the copyright laws, the employer is automatically the author of
and therefore entitled to copyrights in "work made for hire."
If the employee creates the copyrightable work, then it may be work
made for hire if it was created within the scope of that employees
employment. However, as to independent contractors, any copyrightable
work will be work made for hire only if the employer and independent
contractor have a signed written agreement clarifying that it is
truly work for hire. Under both situations it is prudent to have
a clear agreement with the employee or independent contractor.
An
agreement protecting intellectual property should include a confidentiality
provision prohibiting the employee or independent contractor from
disclosing any confidential or proprietary information of the employer,
whether or not it constitutes intellectual property, except through
the employers prior approval. That confidentiality provision
should provide that it survives the termination of the employment
for a certain, specified, reasonable period. Under such an agreement,
what is confidential and proprietary information of the employer
should be defined, and it may be helpful to provide some examples.
For instance, if the employer believes that its customer list is
a valuable trade secret, then the employer may wish to identify
it as one clear example of what constitutes confidential and proprietary
information.
For
independent contractors and employees, it is further important for
them to carefully review such contracts with their employer and
legal counsel in some instances, to determine to what extent the
contract may be read so broadly as to prevent the employee or independent
contractor from owning intellectual property rights developed off
the employers clock and unrelated to her job with the company.
J.
Daniel Marr is a director and shareholder
at Hamblett & Kerrigan, PA whose legal practice includes counseling
businesses and business persons on a variety of legal issues and
advocating on their behalf. Attorney Marr is also an adjunct professor
at Daniel Webster College where he teaches business law. You can
reach Attorney Marr by e-mail at: dmarr@hamker.com
This information is general
information and may not reflect the most current legal developments,
verdicts or settlements. The information provided should not
be relied upon as an indication of the actual state of the
law or of future developments. The information contained on
the Hamblett & Kerrigan website is for informational purposes
only and does not constitute legal advice. If the information
referenced may be of legal importance to you, you should consult
with an attorney to provide you with legal guidance and opinion
as the the effect of the current law upon your situation. |