Employers need to recognize the reality that not
all of their workers may be honest and should take precautions to
minimize the chance that a worker steals from the company.
One of the most costly thefts to an employer may be
embezzlement of funds by someone with access to the company bank
account. The most basic example of this is when someone with check
writing authority on the company account writes checks to themselves
then also having first access to the bank account statements when they
come in, destroys the processed check(s) payable to themselves that
are enclosed with those statements, and enters a false payee into the
company's records so that those payments appear to be to legitimate
suppliers or vendors of the company.
A simple procedure to minimize this type of theft
is to direct the company's bank to send all bank statements directly
to the house of a trusted officer in the company who does not have
check-signing authority and who does not enter the accounts payable
into the company's records. The officer upon receiving those bank
statements will review them for any irregularities, and once reviewed
will turn them over to the company's accounting department for
processing and recording in the ordinary course.
Another source of worker theft is in equipment and
supplies. Sporadic, unannounced, internal inventory audits of
equipment and supplies usually turn up any irregularities that then
can be investigated further as necessary.
As for expenses, it is appropriate to require
receipts and expense reports for expenses over a particular dollar
amount to be prepared by workers prior to reimbursement. It would
again be prudent to conduct sporadic, unannounced internal audits of
an employee's expense reports to confirm that receipts submitted for
reimbursement on expenses incurred on a business trip coincide with
the date and location of such an actual trip.
All of such protective measures not only may catch a dishonest
worker before he has an opportunity to further damage the company, but
also act as a deterrent for those who may be so tempted to consider
stealing from the company.
Employers should understand that not all worker embezzlement
matters are criminally prosecuted and several are handled with private
and confidential restitution agreements between the employer and the
worker.
These agreements do not become public so long as the worker
complies with the payment schedule of the restitution agreement. Since
many owners of a company, after terminating a dishonest worker, are
more interested in restitution than the retribution, such agreements
often make sense.
However, this highlights the fact that such thefts, while in no
manner commonplace, are more prevalent than as published in the media.
Employers should take heed that they are not immune of being victim of
such thefts and should govern themselves accordingly.