![]() |
Site Map Contact Us Disclaimer Blog |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
Last month, State Senator William Brownsberger reintroduced the bill, called "An Act Relative to Noncompetition Agreements."
The bill still has much in common with last year's proposed bill: 1) It generally limits noncompetition agreements to a period of no more than one year; 2) The bill requires "fair and reasonable" compensation for noncompetition agreements entered during the course of employment (i.e., continued employment is not enough); 3) It mandates that, where "reasonably feasible," employers must give candidates advance notice that signing a noncompetition agreement is a condition of employment; and 4) The bill continues to make an employer's decision to seek judicial enforcement a risky decision. Unless the restriction is presumptively reasonable both is time and geographic scope the employer may be assessed for the cost of the employee's legal fees in defending an enforcement action initiated by the employer. As currently written, the new law, if enacted, would apply only to noncompetition agreements entered into on or after January 1, 2012; therefore, the avoiding the need to rewrite and re-execute all existing, but noncompliant, noncompetition agreements.
To read additional Business Organization, Formation & Governance Articles, Click Here. To return to the Legal Articles Home Page, Click Here. To return to the Hamblett & Kerrigan Home Page, Click Here. |
|
||||||||||||